.
Feedback

Op-Ed: Marin County Plans Jeopardize Our Environment

Mill Valley resident says the Marin County Board of Supervisors has not done enough to balance environmental considerations against the need to fulfill state mandated Regional Housing Needs Allocation.

One of the core values that most Marin residents share is a love and respect for nature, which has been demonstrated by a long history of environmental conservation. However, since the adoption of the 2007 Marin Countywide Plan, the county’s leadership has been taking Marin in a different direction.

The most significant finding of the CWP’s Environmental Impact Report was that "land uses and development consistent with the 2007 Countywide Plan would result in 42 significant unavoidable adverse environmental impacts." These impacts include, but are not limited to, traffic congestion, flooding, impending sea level rise, air & noise pollution, endangering habitat and a potential water deficit.

The Marin County Board of Supervisors had an opportunity to reduce these unfortunate impacts, but instead approved the CWP with a “Statement of Overriding Considerations,” essentially stating that providing housing was more important than protecting the environment and public health and safety from the harm that such residential development could cause.

In late 2012, the Board of Supervisors adopted a Countywide Plan Amendment, regarding Policy CD-1.3, which diminishes a major protection for sensitive areas and allows more, higher-density housing to potentially be built in the Baylands’ Corridor, the Ridge and Upland Greenbelts and on sites with sensitive habitat.

Marin County Officials are now reviewing the 2012 Draft Marin County Housing Element, which allows even MORE build-out and adverse environmental impacts than the Countywide Plan.

Worse still, proposed County Housing Element programs and Development Code amendments go beyond what is required by the state and reduce local control and public input by fast-tracking permit review and streamlining environmental review of high density housing.

Why are Marin County Planners ignoring environmental constraints and pushing for more housing? 

There is pressure from the California Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD) to fulfill the state mandated Regional Housing Needs Allocation (RHNA), a quota for housing units that each jurisdiction is supposed to plan for. If the County’s Housing Element fails to meet its allocation, the following could occur:

  1. Unincorporated Marin may not be eligible for regional One Bay Area Grant (OBAG) road improvement funding ($10 million countywide).
  2. Unincorporated Marin’s Housing Element cycle may be accelerated.
  3. The County could be subject to legal action by a third party.
  4. The number of units designated for this Housing Element cycle may be carried over to the next housing cycle.

Yet, to simply comply with the RHNA allocation is short sighted. First of all, the allocation is based on unrealistic job and population projections. The California Department of Finance’s population report shows that between 2015 and 2025, Marin will experience a loss of population, not an increase.

Secondly, Marin County needs to conduct a much more comprehensive, cumulative and long-term cost analysis. The costs related to dealing with the significant adverse environmental impacts caused by overdeveloping our county far outweigh the OBAG grant or additional administration costs. Consider the staggering costs associated with lack of water; cleaning up polluted waterways & habitats; increased damages and injuries due to worsened traffic and placing housing in high seismic activity zones; increased illness due to exposing residents to toxic air contaminants; constructing and maintaining dikes to protect buildings from sea level rise; building new schools, etc.  

Marin County should take back its land use planning and meet the true housing needs of all Marin’s constituents, including lower-income households, in a manner that upholds community character and respects the limits of our environment, infrastructure, and public services.

Specific recommendations on how this can be accomplished will be discussed in my follow up piece entitled: PART II – Marin County Plans – Solutions for Saving Marin’s Environment. That will run on Wednesday on Patch.

Sharon Rushton lives in the Almonte section of unincorporated Mill Valley and is a member of Sustainable TamAlmonte, "a group of Tam Valley and Almonte residents who are concerned about the preservation of our environment, the protection of residents’ health and safety, and the improvement of the semi-rural area's quality of life."

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Mill Valley Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Rhonda J. (Smith) McCormick May 18, 2013 at 04:14 pm
So wish I could be there for the Memorial Day Parade and picnic. I used to join in the fun forRead More years!
Rico May 20, 2013 at 06:25 pm
So, the traffic circles do impede traffic flow and slow motorists down. I do question why the CityRead More of M.V. decided to put a painted traffic circle at an isolated intersection like Cascade and Old Mill. There is not a high volume of traffic at that isolated intersection, and I haven't seen any reports of traffic accidents, injuries or deaths at that intersection. If people use common sense, it's real easy to figure out what to do at that intersection, even with no STOP signs. Perhaps the City of M.V. should remove the traffic circle, and do some more $tudie$. Maybe a STOP sign on Cascade Dr. would be a better solution.
Rico May 20, 2013 at 06:13 pm
I am aware of roundabouts in large cities, and also the concrete island at the library and near OldRead More Mill School. I know someone who lost his son at that location because of a speeding driver(decades ago).
ScottRAB May 20, 2013 at 10:19 am
Mini-roundabouts in the UK are often simply painted large dots in the road. While most USRead More installations are raised up 3 or 4 inches (also used in the UK) due to concerns about scoflaw drivers. The main point is to achieve the safety of a modern roundabout in a confined space, but still permit the occasional large vehicle to make all turns.
Rico May 15, 2013 at 05:16 pm
I guess I can't hit the enter button because that submits the post so from now on (until they fixRead More the problem), all of my posts will be one paragraph. What Angelina did was her choice, based on the multi-billion dollar per cancer industry, and by the people that like do unnecessary surgeries to line their pockets. Ask one of those male doctors if he is willing to have his testicles removed "just in case" he might get testicular cancer in the future. I'll bet that they would laugh at anyone who proposed that question. There are many ways that people can take care of their bodies to prevent cancer, like taking vitamin D, magnesium, selenium, turmeric and many more anti-inflammatory herbs. Also diet and environmental factors play a role in the pre-disposition to get cancer. In most cases, genes only play about a 5% role in a chance of inheriting or contracting cancer. But this big business of cancer research doesn't want hear about anything else besides expensive pharmaceutical drugs and surgery, anything else would threaten their business model. This post is a test of the new Patch commenting system.
Rico May 15, 2013 at 04:55 pm
Yes, and she also announced that she is considering having her ovaries removed also.
Rico May 15, 2013 at 11:04 am
Thanks Jim W. for your reply and explaining things to us. I look forward to a new Patch where peopleRead More are more considerate of other's opinions. I hope the new filters get rid of the hacker/trolls. And by the way, if you don't port over the comments about the transgender shower sharing article that I glanced at last night, you will be doing all of us a favor !
Jim Welte (Editor) May 15, 2013 at 10:32 am
Thanks Rico. You make great points. We had a bit of a tech glitch in that some content from earlierRead More this week did not migrate over yet to the new sites - but it'll all be there soon. And yes, we'll have more info on how to navigate the site. I'll direct you here with any specific questions for now: https://patchsupport.zendesk.com/home But if that doesn't cover it or if you'd prefer to ask me, feel free - happy to help. And that goes for anyone out there with a question about how to get around on the new site.