.
Feedback

LAFCO to Reconsider Southern Marin Fire’s Sausalito Annexation

Commission approved district’s takeover of fire services for Sausalito in November 2011, but a resident and pair of councilmembers oppose the move.

The latest chapter in the Southern Marin Fire Protection District’s proposed annexation of Sausalito’s fire service operations takes place Thursday, as the Marin LAFCO (Local Agency Formation Commission) formally reconsiders its previous decision to approve the move.

On the heels of the seven-member commission’s unanimous decision last November to back the annexation, a trio of opponents to the move began a two-pronged approach to reverse the tide. Two of those opponents dissented when the Sausalito City Council approved the annexation in a 3-2 vote in September 2011.

Councilmembers Carolyn Ford and Linda Pfeifer oppose the annexation along with local resident John Flavin arguing that the move would remove local control and bring undue financial risk on the city’s budget. The annexation would shift 45 percent of the city’s annual property taxes to the Southern Marin district, which serves parts of unincorporated Mill Valley, as well as Strawberry and a small portion of Tiburon.

The commission hears the opponents’ request for it to reconsider its decision Thursday at 7 p.m. in the San Rafael City Council chambers at City Hall.

In case the commission refuses to changes its mind, the opponents have also been gathering petition signatures in an effort to either put the issue on the ballot in November or overturn the annexation entirely. If they obtain signatures from at least 25 percent of Sausalito’s 5,041 registered voters, the issue would go to a ballot measure in November. If they obtain signatures from at least 50 percent of those voters, the commission’s decision would be overturned.

That effort has been going on for the past two months. When asked to summarize the progress of the campaign, Flavin declined to comment. The opponents have until Feb. 13 to turn in their signatures.

The opponents have fought the annexation for reasons related to the pension costs for the 15 fire department employees who would transfer from Sausalito to the Southern Marin District if it occurred.

The opponents claim that because Sausalito and Southern Marin are part of different retirement systems – CalPERS for Sausalito and the Marin County Employees Retirement Association (MCERA) for Southern Marin - the annexation would allow firefighters to “double dip” by retiring from CalPERS, and thus receive pension pay, and then stay on with Southern Marin as employees.

In his staff report on the matter, Peter Banning, LAFCO’s administrative officer, wrote, that “what is referred to as ‘double-dipping’ in the request for reconsideration represents an economically irrational scenario for analysis” because an employee attempting to double dip “would be forfeiting the advantages of MCERA,” as they wouldn’t be eligible for any pension benefit from MCEA for 10 years. Only three of the 15 employees would be eligible to retire from CalPERS, according to the report.

Citing letters and reports from Sausalito city officials, the administrator of the county’s retirement program and an accounting firm contracted by the city, Banning rejected two addition pension-related reasons for the commission to reconsiders its earlier decision.

The LAFCO hearing is the latest development in a saga that dates back nearly a decade. Under a contract for service, the Southern Marin Fire Protection District has managed and operated the Sausalito Fire Department for eight years. District officials signaled an interest in moving towards consolidation in recent years, and although some Sausalito city officials hoped to continue with the contract for service, the district has made it clear it is no longer interested in that relatinship.

District Chief Jim Irving told the Sausalito City Council in July 2011 that the “district is interested in what provides long-term stability for the Fire Department,” and that meant annexation. District board member Cathryn Hilliard backed the sentiment in a letter to the city, saying, “the district is not interested in continuing a contract for service, nor are we interested in entering into a Joint Powers Agreement of any type,” the letter said.

The 411: Marin LAFCO reconsiders it previous approval of the Southern Marin Fire Protection District’s annexation of Sausalito’s fire service operations at 7 p.m. Thursday in the council chambers of San Rafael City Hall, 1400 Fifth Ave., San Rafael.

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Mill Valley Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Rhonda J. (Smith) McCormick May 18, 2013 at 04:14 pm
So wish I could be there for the Memorial Day Parade and picnic. I used to join in the fun forRead More years!
Rico May 20, 2013 at 06:25 pm
So, the traffic circles do impede traffic flow and slow motorists down. I do question why the CityRead More of M.V. decided to put a painted traffic circle at an isolated intersection like Cascade and Old Mill. There is not a high volume of traffic at that isolated intersection, and I haven't seen any reports of traffic accidents, injuries or deaths at that intersection. If people use common sense, it's real easy to figure out what to do at that intersection, even with no STOP signs. Perhaps the City of M.V. should remove the traffic circle, and do some more $tudie$. Maybe a STOP sign on Cascade Dr. would be a better solution.
Rico May 20, 2013 at 06:13 pm
I am aware of roundabouts in large cities, and also the concrete island at the library and near OldRead More Mill School. I know someone who lost his son at that location because of a speeding driver(decades ago).
ScottRAB May 20, 2013 at 10:19 am
Mini-roundabouts in the UK are often simply painted large dots in the road. While most USRead More installations are raised up 3 or 4 inches (also used in the UK) due to concerns about scoflaw drivers. The main point is to achieve the safety of a modern roundabout in a confined space, but still permit the occasional large vehicle to make all turns.
Rico May 15, 2013 at 05:16 pm
I guess I can't hit the enter button because that submits the post so from now on (until they fixRead More the problem), all of my posts will be one paragraph. What Angelina did was her choice, based on the multi-billion dollar per cancer industry, and by the people that like do unnecessary surgeries to line their pockets. Ask one of those male doctors if he is willing to have his testicles removed "just in case" he might get testicular cancer in the future. I'll bet that they would laugh at anyone who proposed that question. There are many ways that people can take care of their bodies to prevent cancer, like taking vitamin D, magnesium, selenium, turmeric and many more anti-inflammatory herbs. Also diet and environmental factors play a role in the pre-disposition to get cancer. In most cases, genes only play about a 5% role in a chance of inheriting or contracting cancer. But this big business of cancer research doesn't want hear about anything else besides expensive pharmaceutical drugs and surgery, anything else would threaten their business model. This post is a test of the new Patch commenting system.
Rico May 15, 2013 at 04:55 pm
Yes, and she also announced that she is considering having her ovaries removed also.
Rico May 15, 2013 at 11:04 am
Thanks Jim W. for your reply and explaining things to us. I look forward to a new Patch where peopleRead More are more considerate of other's opinions. I hope the new filters get rid of the hacker/trolls. And by the way, if you don't port over the comments about the transgender shower sharing article that I glanced at last night, you will be doing all of us a favor !
Jim Welte (Editor) May 15, 2013 at 10:32 am
Thanks Rico. You make great points. We had a bit of a tech glitch in that some content from earlierRead More this week did not migrate over yet to the new sites - but it'll all be there soon. And yes, we'll have more info on how to navigate the site. I'll direct you here with any specific questions for now: https://patchsupport.zendesk.com/home But if that doesn't cover it or if you'd prefer to ask me, feel free - happy to help. And that goes for anyone out there with a question about how to get around on the new site.