Politics & Government

F-Bombs OK? FCC Asks If It Should Ease Swearing, Nudity Ban

One Mill Valley resident says he opposes allowing TV and radio stations to broadcast expletives and nudity on the public airwaves, even if brief or fleeting.

Should the Federal Communications Commission lighten up on enforcing its ban on swear words and nudity on broadcast media?

The agency has proposed doing just that—letting "fleeting" violations slide and enforcing its rules only for "egregious" offenses.

The FCC invited comments for 60 days on the enforcement change in an April 1 announcement (click on PDF thumnail).

Find out what's happening in Mill Valleywith free, real-time updates from Patch.

Two Mill Valley residents have weighed in so far, with Phillip Conner commenting on April 9 and Susan Shaver on April 15. They submitted identical comments:

"I oppose any changes to the current FCC indecency standards that would allow television and radio stations to broadcast expletives and nudity on the public airwaves, even if brief or 'fleeting.'

Find out what's happening in Mill Valleywith free, real-time updates from Patch.

The Supreme Court has confirmed the FCC's authority to enforce policies regarding expletives and nudity, especially during times when children are likely to be watching or listening.

Relaxing the current policy would not serve the public interest and I urge the FCC to reject allproposals that would allow for the broadcast of expletives and nudity on FCC-licensed stations."

Comments submitted to the FCC are public. You can see them by searching a comment database at the FCC website.

Click on the YouTube thumbnail (or visit YouTube.com) for an example of the "fleeting expletives" behind the U.S. Supreme Court case cited by the FCC. It's Cher at the 2002 Billboard Music Awards (6:00 mark—profanity warning).


Get more local news delivered straight to your inbox. Sign up for free Patch newsletters and alerts.

We’ve removed the ability to reply as we work to make improvements. Learn more here