Crime & Safety

Naso Insists on Representing Himself at Trial

The accused serial killer refused to spend his own money on representation.

Joseph Naso, the Reno man in Northern California between 1977 and 1994, adamantly asserted his right to represent himself at his trial Friday morning.

Naso, 78, told Marin County Superior Court Judge Andrew Sweet he does not want the county public defender's office involved in his case.

"I will say it loud and clear so everyone hears. I don't want the public defender replacing me," Naso said.

Find out what's happening in Mill Valleywith free, real-time updates from Patch.

Naso was held over for trial last month on charges of killing Roxene Roggasch, 18, of Oakland in Marin County in 1977; Carmen Colon, 22, in Port Costa in Contra Costa County in 1978; Pamela Parsons, 38, and Tracy Tafoya in Yuba County in 1993 and 1994, respectively.

Testimony during Naso's preliminary hearing indicated the women, who worked as prostitutes, were strangled and dumped along rural roads.

Find out what's happening in Mill Valleywith free, real-time updates from Patch.

Naso has been representing himself in court and did not re-enter pleas to the charges and the special circumstance of committing multiple murders that subjects him to the death penalty.

Sweet asked Naso last week to fill out a questionnaire regarding his intention to continue representing himself.

"The court has to make sure you are aware of your right to counsel and that your waiver of that right is voluntary," Sweet said.

Naso told the judge he misplaced the questionnaire.

"I'd like to take a rain check on that," Naso said. He told the judge he has been secretly trying to obtain advisory counsel.

Sweet said he is prepared to appoint a public defender to represent Naso. He said whether Naso would have to pay for one would be determined after the trial.

Naso has claimed he cannot afford an attorney. The Marin County District Attorney's Office has argued Naso has $1 million in liquid assets.

Naso told Sweet he "wouldn't spend one nickel on this kind of representation.

"If I had the three best attorneys in the county and it didn't cost a nickel, I'd still have to think about it," Naso said.

"Attorneys like to age cases," he said. "I'm thinking of not waiving my time and to get on with the trial."

Naso also said there is no privacy in jail regarding communications with an attorney.

"We can't shake hands and exchange papers," Naso said.

Naso then said he didn't care to fill out the questionnaire.

"I may not grant you the right to represent yourself if you don't fill it out," Sweet replied.

"If I fill it out, it will be under duress," Naso said.

He also said he didn't want the questionnaire to become a public document.

Sweet said he would seal the questionnaire. "No one will see it but you and me," the judge said.

Naso is scheduled to return to court Wednesday morning with the questionnaire.

--Bay City News Service


Get more local news delivered straight to your inbox. Sign up for free Patch newsletters and alerts.

We’ve removed the ability to reply as we work to make improvements. Learn more here

To request removal of your name from an arrest report, submit these required items to arrestreports@patch.com.