Originally built in 1913, this two-bedroom house was completely rebuilt in 2008. It has two full bathrooms and a half-bath, is 2,189 square feet and is listed for $1,595,000.
The house is situated on about one third of an acre in the Mill Valley hills, affording expansive views in many directions.
There is a 300-square-foot studio space with a private entrance.
The main house features a chef’s kitchen with a walnut island, breakfast nook, open living and dining room, hardwood floors and a gas fireplace. There are two master suites, a two-car garage and ample decks.
The property is near the Dipsea Trail and Stinson Beach and within three miles of five elementary schools, all of which scoring either a 9 or 10 in the GreatSchools Rating system.
Pacific Union represents the property. For more information, visit the AOL Real Estate page.
We have this one real estate column on Mill Valley Patch featuring a different home each week, which we started about a month ago and is very popular among readers. If you ever see anything that's actually posted by a real estate spammer, please let me know. Happy Holidays! Cate
Thank you for your reply. You have written: "At Patch, we promise always to report the facts as objectively as possible and otherwise adhere to the principles of good journalism." Just pointing out the obvious that real estate advertising is not journalism (especially when the same ad continues to appear). Merry Christmas, Jack
Ads for unconscionably expensive real estate directing the reader to the realtor + links to a half dozen more websites advertizing more real estate? How can you simultaneously " promise to adhere to the principles of good journalism" while "not purporting this to be good journalism?" I support your otherwise good journalism, thank you.
http://www.hairballspamsite.info.
http://www.nytimes.com/slideshow/2013/01/13/realestate/20130113-OTMMIAMI.html
You must understand that newspapers have been struggling for many years, due to online media. But, they are both in a very competitive industry that relies almost 100 percent on advertising revenue to exist. Do you think that the Patch makes money off of our comments ? No, the Patch is owned by AOL, which was one of the first and largest internet providers in the country. I remember getting CD's delivered in the mail from AOL to load their program into my computer. To me, that was unsoliced junk mail that I had to chuck into the circular file (trash can). And the IJ has been running front page articles that were actually publically funded advertisements for the SMART train, the MMWD (desal plant-water deficit propaganda) and a host of other developers with their new "north bay agenda". The exact same thing with the Pacific Sun, both of these papers would have gone bankrupt if it wasn't for us taxpayer to run advertising disguised as articles. Actually, even though we generously donated to the IJ welfare fund for SMART train advertising even BEFORE the measure Q was passed by the voters of Sonoma county, the IJ did go bankrupt ! You have to realize that any public internet site that offers a free commenting forum, needs revenue from somewhere. The IJ switched over to a Facebook commenting system, and Facebook recieves money from data mining and the taxpayers for working with the FBI to track people, which they must kick some dough down to the IJ.